I’ve been thinking about love lately. Before I kick off let me clarify: I’m not reading slush books stretched out on a floppy sofa, eating chocolate and drinking red wine. Rather it’s been on my mind in the objective sense. (Aside: I’ve just had a very nice English man come over to tell me that I’d left my laptop case behind. Not that there is anything important in it…other than my passport, wallet, Blackberry and money. Lucky this is Changi and not Manila.)
Anyways, back to the topic at hand and a couple of the things I’ve been mulling over. First up, the idea that somehow “love at first sight” should be on any sort of pedestal. I get the excitement factor given that, like most people, I’ve looked at someone for the first time and just known that I’d be spending significant time with them, or in some cases a shorter but more vigorous time in them. Either ways is great I’m sure you’d agree (I wonder who “you” is….)
But I’ve never had “love” at first sight. Like I said, I’ve certainly had “I really want to put my peeny weeny in your teeny tiny vaginey” at first sight but that’s just your basic garden variety lust. Nothing too special there. Which is why I may be missing something when it comes to the idea. You see, to me, love that occurs after knowing someone for a time should be seen as incredibly romantic and special. Anyone can unknowingly sniff a chemical given off by the opposite sex and be quickly fooled into thinking that the feelings they feel are anything more than that ancient evolutionary dance to keep our species in a position where they can watch TV and believe in the fairies. It takes so much more of our spirits to look at someone when that stuff has worn off (or never happened?) and still feel a strong attraction or connection. Apparently it takes 18 months for the chemical part of attraction to wear off as nature presumably assumes by then that the baby is born and is past the most dangerous part of its infancy. It’s then that you realise she’s a shallow fucking muppet, or that he’s not edgy but just another insecure cock.
So then, surely as an evolved species, the love we should be putting on a pedestal is the one where Bob and Mary, after 5 years as nothing more than co-workers at the post office, look at each other one Friday morning and know something is different. With stories swapped and a slowly built up trust, they realise there is a whole lot more than stamp-licking between them. Boooooyooyooooinnnnggg. That to me is supremely beautiful. I’m not saying there is anything wrong with instant and strong attraction, or love if that’s your bag. I’m just saying that maybe that shit is too easy.
Unfortunately, beauty and excitement are easily confused. It’s the difference in euphoria felt because you’re into your third pill compared to the deep happiness in the last third of a long run. They both come from chemical shenanigans but one takes work and one takes nothing more than $50 by three. (Do you fuck a whore, or do you work at seduction?)
The media is bursting with promises of “the one”. Meet-cutes happen every episode and the movie world is full of lovers bouncing around like grains a la Brownian motion just waiting to bump into the right other grain. The arcs of modern movies are predictable as are the moments of realisation. “Holey fuckin assclowns! It’s been YOU all along. I just NOW realised that I’m totally in love with you. I’d never seen you without your glasses before.” How fucking retarded would you have to be to not realise something like that? Or more to the point, how absolutely self-absorbed would you need to be…answers on a postcard. Again, a tangent off the point…it’s just my way.
It’s bullshit (or that’s my stance right now – I’m going through a cold phase). It seems we’ve been fed a line of crap about what we’re supposed to feel. Like everything these days, we’re missing the beauty of the reality while we’re yearning for something that a writer has put together so we can escape for 90 minutes with some buttered popcorn.
Sorry folks (though only the be-boobed ones will need a “sorry”) but Twilight is bollox. It’s just one example from the stream of puerile shit designed to appeal to women’s need for emotional heroin that feels good but isn’t good for you. And all apologies to the ridiculous amount of women the world over who buy into the fucking irritatingly self-absorbed shitola that is that movie franchise (not that they’ll ever read this). I’m not saying your kids are ugly. I’m just saying that if you find that nonsense romantic then good luck ever being happy. Just like God, there ain’t no vampires. And there is nothing beautiful about the wankology of “the love you can’t have” expressed via the medium of werewolves, vampires and Ewoks (not sure if the Ewoks made it into Twilight but I hope so). I know it’s just a story but I’m annoyed with:
- how shite “Twilight” was as a movie
- the emo-eque self-absorbed horseshit content
- how insulting it must be to anyone who’s ever really loved someone they couldn’t be with (interned men at war, economic migrants forced to leave wives and children, women who lose men to cancer)
- the fact that no woman is ever going to find me as attractive as Robert Patterson
Though some movies do get it. They get that real love is admirable and beautiful and everything good about us as a species. It’s the love of a man who shows up every day for the wife who only remembers him for fleeting flashes. The man who said the words “we’ve already been here”. The man who goes to Montauk instead of work. (Three of my favourite movies.)
OK, the coffee has run out and I feel like wandering before boarding so I’ll end yet another intransigent post – half finished but fuck it. Tomorrow I’ll have done a complete 360 (someone said that to me once and it still gives me a giggle) and be back writing wanky “words”…
Oh and fuck Justin Bieber.